I'm sure this has been covered before, but I tried to search the forum and couldn't find an answer. I have '67 GT500 #589 and I'm trying to figure out what the original shocks were supposed to be. I always thought they came with adjustable Koni's but I have been told recently that that is not correct. Clarification would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
IIRC - FoMoCo stamped adjustable shocks painted black made by Gabriel for Ford
There is a guy that make/modifies versions that are a good representation, Dan Patch -
https://dansshocks.com/
others will comment too.
Thank you....
What are the performance characteristics of the Gabriels compared to the Konis?
Quote from: 2112 on August 21, 2019, 12:56:30 AM
What are the performance characteristics of the Gabriels compared to the Konis?
Koni's can take more abuse and are the racers choice by comparison. If you compare them side by side the Koni's look beefier too.
The reason I asked this question initially is my car was heading into a shop to have the front end rebuilt, new shocks etc. I have owned the car since '82 and have never done anything to the suspension, the car's a driver that I have put about 42,000 miles on since I've owned it. I bought it with 54,000 miles on it. after all those years and miles the front end was starting to feel a bit sloppy. I assume but don't know that the previous owners never replaced the shocks, but these are the shocks that came off the car. Could these be originals or is it likely they were replaced before I purchased the car?
Those are not what Ford installed when they built the car to Shelby specifications, which would have been FoMoCo stamped adjustable shocks painted black made by Gabriel for Ford. (Shelby did not change-out the shocks on the cars when they completed them.)
Someone previous to your ownership installed the Koni's that are on your car.
If you liked the way they performed and sounds like you drive your car (great to hear) then rebuild them if needed or replace with a new set of Koni's. (Some that do use the Koni's and don't want to have them be as apparent will paint them black)
Koni shocks are the number one most common things added to any year Shelby (even exchanged on my 65 and early 66's) 65-70 . I agree with previous post that a 67 Shelby would come from the factory with adjustable FOMOCO marked shocks very early or Autolite marked adjustable for the vast majority of production. The Koni's are over kill for the street but a viable alternative.
In your picture it looks like the date is 11-64 which would not be original to your car. They "could" be for a lower number '65 GT350. I agree with the others in that your car was built with the "spec" Ford adjustable shocks initially. If you had the original invoice and it noted Koni shocks and an upcharge , you should have them Konis were a very popular add on back then as others mentioned. So much so that many take them as being "standard equipment". '67 dates would be a plus.
Randy
Bob, I listed FoMoCo as the brand stamped on the shocks as Owen's car was assembled 1/11/67 at San Jose. Is it known when the AUTOLITE marked version was implemented? Would this car have had the AUTOLITE version?
Quote from: JD on August 23, 2019, 12:16:00 PM
Bob, I listed FoMoCo as the brand stamped on the shocks as Owen's car was assembled 1/11/67 at San Jose. Is it known when the AUTOLITE marked version was implemented? Would this car have had the AUTOLITE version?
JD based on what I've collected I would have expected that this car would have come with the FoMoCo stamped shocks rather than the AUTOLITE ones so . Have cars built after 1/11 with the FoMoCo shocks. Currently it appears that the change took place likely in Feb 1967 though they had been making the AUTOLITE shocks earlier than that - just took that much time to use up the old stock and get the new version in to the process
While we're touching on the AUTOLITE though wanted to mention there were two versions (differences in the stamping) of the later AUTOLITE - made in Canada shocks versions also.
Thank you for your input everyone. So since these shocks are not original to my car, and they are worn out, is there any reason to hang on to them? Would they have any value to anyone or should I just toss them?
Quote from: owenkelley on August 23, 2019, 06:09:25 PM
Thank you for your input everyone. So since these shocks are not original to my car, and they are worn out, is there any reason to hang on to them? Would they have any value to anyone or should I just toss them?
Yes they likely have some value to someone. For showing the shocks don't really have to perform as new ones and they can be rebuilt or that has been an option in the past. So that option might be one that you want to explore considering that they were likely the same version that were original on your car or may have value for a future owner of your car.
Value will depend on condition of each, the person interested as well as you ;)
Quote from: JD on August 23, 2019, 12:16:00 PM
Bob, I listed FoMoCo as the brand stamped on the shocks as Owen's car was assembled 1/11/67 at San Jose. Is it known when the AUTOLITE marked version was implemented? Would this car have had the AUTOLITE version?
The FoMoCo shocks were being phased out in Oct/Nov 66 for sure. Several of the earliest finished cars that I had the chance to study that still had original shocks on them including #0001 had a mix of FOMOCO and Autolite marked shocks in use on the same car. That would suggest the phase out started at the very least when 67 Production started. I wouldn't be surprised if the phase out of the FOMOCO marked shocks could have started in very late 66 GT350 production.
Quote from: Bob Gaines on August 23, 2019, 08:34:47 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if the phase out of the FOMOCO marked shocks could have started in very late 66 GT350 production.
Just in an effort to share have not seen any dated early enough to have been installed on any late 66's and have found them on 67's into the 600's
Do you know what the dates are on the Autolite shocks on 001 are?
Quote from: J_Speegle on August 23, 2019, 09:32:36 PM
Quote from: Bob Gaines on August 23, 2019, 08:34:47 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if the phase out of the FOMOCO marked shocks could have started in very late 66 GT350 production.
Just in an effort to share have not seen any dated early enough to have been installed on any late 66's and have found them on 67's into the 600's
Do you know what the dates are on the Autolite shocks on 001 are?
I don't have the info off hand but I will try and remember to check when I put 0001 in the air to look.
The thread will be here when you get to it :)
I'm curious about the issue with Koni shocks that required the axle cables on the 65 cars. Is that not an issue if Konis are used on a 67?
Quote from: mlplunkett on August 24, 2019, 12:16:06 AM
I'm curious about the issue with Koni shocks that required the axle cables on the 65 cars. Is that not an issue if Konis are used on a 67?
65's were designed for the Koni's while in 67 they were just installed by owners and local shops just like other car makes (Camaros, Corvettes...) so not allot of thought was put into any engineering. Like allot of things they were just slapped on by many
Added - Senior moment I guess Bob and I, as well as others, have discussed the real purpose of the cables in years past. ::) as Bob noted below
Quote from: mlplunkett on August 24, 2019, 12:16:06 AM
I'm curious about the issue with Koni shocks that required the axle cables on the 65 cars. Is that not an issue if Konis are used on a 67?
This has been discussed before. I know I am a heretic for talking about this but there is no documentation then or now in the Konl literature that suggests the need for cables to limit the travel of the koni' shocks. Logically if there was a potential problem the Koni factory would have put something in the pamplets to indicate that . Other makes and models racing back in the day or now using koni shocks didn't need them to limit shock travel ether. The shocks have built in piston stops.The cables were to keep the body from extending to far on one side compare to the other in a turn . The weight transfer of leaning excessively in a turn could cause loss of control and traction . The cables most logically were a inexpensive simple roll or lean control aid. The term limiting cables is correct it is just not to limit shock travel but body travel as in leaning or roll control. The shock limiting cable usage is a long time misinterpreted urban legend . Axle limiting cable or body roll limiting cable are more accurate descriptions of what they were used for.
So after removing the shocks from my car we discovered that the front shocks were the replacement Konis and the rear shocks were the original Gabriels. Thought that was kinda strange that they would bother replacing the fronts but not the backs. Any ideas other than the original owner trying to improve handling but save a few bucks? Possibly a problem with one of the front shocks so replacing both of those but not needing to replace all four?
Seems the first thing to go are the top bushings on the front shocks especially if car jacked up until weight rests on the bushing. Other than that they seem to last a long long time without leaking.
Quote from: owenkelley on August 31, 2019, 06:55:08 AM
So after removing the shocks from my car we discovered that the front shocks were the replacement Konis and the rear shocks were the original Gabriels. .................
For us keeping records, data and doing studies of things related which version of the adjustables did you find and what's the car number
Thanks
As far as mismatched shocks. Likely just some past owner saving some money on what may have been, at the time, a somewhat inexpensive car. Markings on the Konis could lead you to when (with in a range) they might have been changed out
For the record #185 production date at SJ 12/01/1966 has what I believe are the original shocks (the fronts have sound deadener over spray on them). Black with Autolite stamped on all 4, adjustable on the front, with 2 settings. Rick
Quote from: motorhead428 on September 04, 2019, 09:41:47 PM
For the record #185 production date at SJ 12/01/1966 has what I believe are the original shocks (the fronts have sound deadener over spray on them). Black with Autolite stamped on all 4, adjustable on the front, with 2 settings. Rick
There are 3 settings. Soft, Normal, Firm.
I wire brushed a little more of the sound deadener off the front shocks and Mr. Gaines is correct 3 settings.