News:

SPECIAL NOTICE - See SAAC-50 Forum for DATE CHANGE for SAAC-50

Main Menu

Tires - Goodyear - John Bessey - Bella

Started by rmarble57, May 28, 2021, 11:35:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

oldcanuck

WOW.... those do look good. Very good.

There you go Fran.......
Bob
Knoxvegas, TN

rmarble57

#16
Been away from the computer for a bit, but wanted to circle back to the questions.

For tire sizes, I went with 225/60-15 all the way around.  I have absolutely no rubbing issues whatsoever and for my taste, that size is the widest you can put on the stock wheels or you end up with a bulge in the middle.  FYI:  my car does not have any extra holes for the "Shelby Lowering" of the front end so it has an uphill attitude.

Section width of the original E70-15's is 8.4" and the 225/60-15 is 9.13 so IMHO just about the widest thing you would want on the original width rims.
If you are running other type wheels, I believe that all of the additional width of tire on the rear would need to be on the inside.  I wouldn't put them any closer to the outside wheel lip.

I'm cut from a different cloth that some, in that I want my car to appear as original as possible (he says that while he has webers and Tri-Y headers under the hood), but I also am going to drive the car as much as I want and not think of it as a piece of art.  I don't like cars that don't start, handle, run smoothly(fast) and represent what good ol' Shel would have wanted. 

I have the utmost respect for those that chase the Concours Crowns and their place in the books is necessary for the Marque, just as mine is to drive and enjoy the experience.  I know the limitations and don't pretend that 1967 technology comes close to modern cars, but at the time my brain was infected with Shelby Mustangs (1967), they were "The Going Thing".

S7MS427

Quote from: rmarble57 on June 05, 2021, 07:46:57 PM
I'm cut from a different cloth that some, in that I want my car to appear as original as possible (he says that while he has webers and Tri-Y headers under the hood), but I also am going to drive the car as much as I want and not think of it as a piece of art.  I don't like cars that don't start, handle, run smoothly(fast) and represent what good ol' Shel would have wanted. 

I have the utmost respect for those that chase the Concours Crowns and their place in the books is necessary for the Marque, just as mine is to drive and enjoy the experience.  I know the limitations and don't pretend that 1967 technology comes close to modern cars, but at the time my brain was infected with Shelby Mustangs (1967), they were "The Going Thing".
Love it!
Roy Simkins
http://www.s-techent.com/Shelby.htm
1966 G.T.350H SFM6S817
1967 G.T.500 67400F7A03040

67 GT350

"Been away from the computer for a bit, but wanted to circle back to the questions."

Really? "circle back?" Really?
RARE  Signature Delete

JD

#19
off topic sorry John B ;-) but tangential to the Webers posted above - I have a complete weber 48 IDA's setup for Small Block 289 with linkage, COBRA manifold tapped for vacuum lines and collector manifold for brake vacuum, 4th iteration Italian Webers and 70's COBRA intake. PM me if interested.
'67 Shelby Headlight Bucket Grommets https://www.saacforum.com/index.php?topic=254.0
'67 Shelby Lower Grille Edge Protective Strip https://www.saacforum.com/index.php?topic=1237.0

Bob Gaines

I just drove 14 hours home today from Ford Carlisle and saw your picture. In the picture you have the shorter 65/66 hose and not the longer 67/68 hose regardless of how it is stamped.Just thought you would want to know. It looks very stretched to the limit. 67/68 needed the extra length given the different radiators compared to 65/66 style. I have heard of others having that same short hose problem with the Marti hoses. Sorry I only have extra NOS 67/68 correct hoses and can not offer a correct repro solution. I know that they are out there because I have seen them.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby