News:

SAAC Member Badges are NOW available. Make your request through saac.memberlodge.com to validate membership.

Main Menu

NOS C6DZ-10884-B Temp Sender

Started by s2ms, September 24, 2024, 01:33:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

s2ms

Came across this recently which has me a little confused. I thought the -B senders all have a red insulator while the white insulator was only seen on the -A sender? I have NOS Autolite and Motorcraft -B senders which both have red insulators. At first I thought this was just mis-boxed but it does have the proper 260 temp rating for a -B.

Is it possible the very early -B sender insulators were also white or could the red have completely faded away? Any suggestions for coloring, paint vs dye?

Thanks,
Dave







Dave - 6S1757

68blk500c

That is very early box.  I'm guessing that under that adhesive C6 label is an earlier part number.  Ford service parts keep us on our toes.

Bob Gaines

Possibly the red dye you see on the threaded stud is a indicator in the same way the red insulator indicates what it is. Red dye on the threaded stud is not typical on all of the NOS or in the wild senders that I have seen.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

s2ms

Quote from: 68blk500c on September 24, 2024, 02:51:25 PMThat is very early box.  I'm guessing that under that adhesive C6 label is an earlier part number.  Ford service parts keep us on our toes.

Was wondering the same, pulled the label back, no sign of anything under it.
Dave - 6S1757

Bob Gaines

Simple enough to put some red Dykem dye on the insulator so as to make it look as expected.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

6s1640

Hi guys,

Please educate us.  What does the white and red colored sender mean?  Is it the temperature range of the sender, or does it pair with certain year cars and temperature gauges.

I ask because I had a old sender that was reading low on the temperature gauge.  I swapped out for an aftermarket sender and the gauge read really high.  With the old and new sender, I checked the temperatures with an infrared thermometer on different engine parts and the values were in acceptably ranges and matched.  I then try a different gauge I got the same result.  I then swapped the sender again and got a more normal reading on the temperature gauge.  What am I missing?

Thanks

Cory

s2ms

Quote from: Bob Gaines on September 25, 2024, 01:25:40 PMSimple enough to put some red Dykem dye on the insulator so as to make it look as expected.

Thanks Bob, I'll give that a try...
Dave - 6S1757

s2ms

Quote from: 6s1640 on September 25, 2024, 03:50:19 PMHi guys,

Please educate us.  What does the white and red colored sender mean?  Is it the temperature range of the sender, or does it pair with certain year cars and temperature gauges.

I ask because I had a old sender that was reading low on the temperature gauge.  I swapped out for an aftermarket sender and the gauge read really high.  With the old and new sender, I checked the temperatures with an infrared thermometer on different engine parts and the values were in acceptably ranges and matched.  I then try a different gauge I got the same result.  I then swapped the sender again and got a more normal reading on the temperature gauge.  What am I missing?

Thanks
Cory

Hi Cory,

The C6DZ-10884-B sender was mostly used in V8's starting in 1966, it (typically) has a red insulator and 260* temp rating. The C6DZ-10884-A sender was mostly used in 6-cyl but IIRC also some V8's in 1967 and later, it has a white insulator and 250* temp rating. Temp ratings are stamped on one sender nut face. Not near an MPC at the moment but that will have all the details. Bob Mannel's book also has a nice SFB breakdown.

Dave
Dave - 6S1757

silverton_ford


s2ms

Thanks Brian!

Gets a little more confusing with the info in the 60-68 MPC and Bob Mannel's SBF book, both show the white insulator -A sensor was used on V8's:

1960-68 MPC: (only showing Mustang applications to keep it simple)
------------------------------------------------------------------
C6DZ-10884-A, stamped 250, 3/8"-18 pipe thread, includes white insulator:
- 1966 - 6-cylinder
- 1967-68 - all except 428CJ

C6DZ-10884-B, stamped 260, 3/8"-18 pipe thread, includes red insulator:
- 1966 - 8-cylinder (289, 390, 428)
- 1968 - 428CJ


Bob Mannel's SBF Book: (only lists SBF applications, I'm only showing Mustangs)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C6DZ-10884-A, stamped 250, 3/8"-18 pipe thread, 1-5/8" long, white insulator:
- 1967-69 Mustang (SBF)

C6DZ-10884-B, stamped 260, 3/8"-18 pipe thread, 1-5/8" long, red insulator:
- 1966 Mustang (SBF)

Dave - 6S1757

J_Speegle

#10
Consider or just be aware that the MPC's often showed not what part was used originally but what part Ford had in the system at the time the MPC was printed, would function as a replacement. Example would be the page from a MPC in reply #8. It shows what Ford had in 1975 almost ten years after the cars were built.

Sometimes same part as original while other times a replacement or substitute. This fact can sometimes explain conflicting data
Jeff Speegle- Mustang & Shelby detail collector, ConcoursMustang.com mentor :) and Judge

Karguy

#11
I see that the unit that Dave shows in the pictures has the cursive Ford type F along with the 260 stamp in it. Is that correct OE 65/66 289 hipo style or what they would've used from SA? Sounds like the main difference is the lack of red on the insulator, correct?
Thanks
6S281, in my family from 1972-1983. Back home January 2017, will not leave again!

Bob Gaines

Quote from: Karguy on September 28, 2024, 03:52:07 PMI see that the unit that Dave shows in the pictures has the cursive Ford type F along with the 260 stamp in it. Is that correct OE 65/66 289 hipo style or what they would've used from SA? Sounds like the main difference is the lack of red on the insulator, correct?
Thanks
Correct, main difference is the lack of red insulator. FYI that can easily be remedied. I have a strong suspicion that the red dye on the threads was in at least this case taking the place of the red insulator as a identifier.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Karguy

Thanks Bob, have you seen the water temp sensors that Dennis Carpenter makes with the red insulator? Thoughts?
6S281, in my family from 1972-1983. Back home January 2017, will not leave again!

s2ms

Quote from: Karguy on September 28, 2024, 03:52:07 PMI see that the unit that Dave shows in the pictures has the cursive Ford type F along with the 260 stamp in it. Is that correct OE 65/66 289 hipo style or what they would've used from SA? Sounds like the main difference is the lack of red on the insulator, correct?
Thanks

I believe the 65 Cobra intake used the smaller diameter C5DZ sender.

Quote from: Karguy on September 28, 2024, 04:38:12 PMThanks Bob, have you seen the water temp sensors that Dennis Carpenter makes with the red insulator? Thoughts?

Not Bob, but other than the lack of correct stamped markings, the Dennis Carpenter red insulator looks pretty nice to me...

https://www.dennis-carpenter.com/cars/cooling-system/temperature-senders/c6dz-10884-b-temperature-sender-p65
Dave - 6S1757