News:

SPECIAL NOTICE - See SAAC-50 Forum for DATE CHANGE for SAAC-50

Main Menu

Recent extraction 1967 GT500 down since 1974

Started by 6s1640, October 03, 2018, 01:22:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

6s1640

Hi all,

Here are some images of a recent extraction from a owner that put the car down in 1974 and never finished.  The car is being re-assembled to return back to the California DMV to have the car inspected and a new title issued.  The CA DMV said they would not issue the title to an incomplete car.  The below images are from a few weeks ago at the prior owner's shop.

Enjoy

Cory

6s1640

#1
Hi All,

The car has been shipped and received and is going back together.  See images below.  It is a very solid car.  The tilt steering column is from a 1967 Cougar.   Notice 428 markings on rear valance.  I am assuming a San Jose marking.  The wood steering wheel is going to need some serious help.  When re-assembly, the car will appear to be a survivor that has lived a rough life.

I will be getting more images this week.  There is a matching date coded 428 waiting to be installed.  Dave Mathews has been contacted.

Cory

2112

Cool!

Is the car yours? By survivor, do you mean no restoration planned?

6s1640

Quote from: 2112 on October 03, 2018, 01:42:27 AM
Cool!

Is the car yours? By survivor, do you mean no restoration planned?

Not mine, but I think a full resto is planned.  The car is just passing through a shop in my town to its new owner.

Cory

gt350cs

Great pictures and story. GT500 428 was Dark Moss Green. Is this in fact 428?

CharlesTurner

428 on the rear valence was most likely just a coincidence as San Jose usually wrote 3 digit rotation numbers somewhere on the valence.
Charles Turner
MCA/SAAC Judge

J_Speegle

#6
Quote from: CharlesTurner on October 03, 2018, 10:48:55 AM
428 on the rear valence was most likely just a coincidence as San Jose usually wrote 3 digit rotation numbers somewhere on the valence.

+1 Just the second (but still cool to find) rotation number assigned to that Mustang body on the line at San Jose  during the second half of assembly.  WOuld have been thousands of cars with the same rotation numbers - different time periods - but this one just happened to line up well their the car.

Not sure why DMV was so picky this time.  Might have been able to get a patrol officer (PD) come by and confirm and sign the paperwork instead.
Jeff Speegle- Mustang & Shelby detail collector, ConcoursMustang.com mentor :) and Judge

Richstang

#7
6s1640,

Neat car! It looks like an amazing find with little to no rust.

I have this '67 GT500 in my photo files in a completed built state, unrestored, and listed as recently sold. There is a link from an ad with more photos and info, but don't want to spoil your fun if you're planning to share more info. The VIN # is in the mid 500's and there is a Marti report. Let me know... 

Rich
1967 Shelby Research Group 

www.1967ShelbyResearch.com
www.facebook.com/groups/1967shelbyresearch

1991-1993 SAAC MKI, MKII, & Snake Registrar

2112

Quote from: 6s1640 on October 03, 2018, 02:33:37 AM
Quote from: 2112 on October 03, 2018, 01:42:27 AM
Cool!

Is the car yours? By survivor, do you mean no restoration planned?

Not mine, but I think a full resto is planned.  The car is just passing through a shop in my town to its new owner.

Cory

Are you in California? I thought you might have been from the PNW.

98SVT - was 06GT

Quote from: J_Speegle on October 03, 2018, 05:39:43 PM
Quote from: CharlesTurner on October 03, 2018, 10:48:55 AM
428 on the rear valence was most likely just a coincidence as San Jose usually wrote 3 digit rotation numbers somewhere on the valence.

+1 Just the second (but still cool to find) rotation number assigned to that Mustang body on the line at San Jose  during the second half of assembly.  WOuld have been thousands of cars with the same rotation numbers - different time periods - but this one just happened to line up well their the car.

Not sure why DMV was so picky this time.  Might have been able to get a patrol officer (PD) come by and confirm and sign the paperwork instead.

CHP might sign it off but you'll have to go to them - car on trailer. Check first and make sure it's not stolen - happened to a friend he pulled a car out of a guys back yard who was moving and couldn't find the pink. He dropped in a motor took it to DMV and they promptly impounded the car. Way was the title surrendered? I'd not want to get a salvage/rebuilt branded title.
Previous owner 6S843 - GT350H & 68 GT500 Convert #135.
Mine: GT1 Mustang, 1998 SVT 32V, 1929 Model A Coupe, Wife's: 2004 Tbird
Member since 1975 - priceless

J_Speegle

Quote from: 98SVT - was 06GT on October 03, 2018, 11:23:09 PM
CHP might sign it off but you'll have to go to them - car on trailer. ...............

Haven't had to do one for a while. Use to be able to just have one of the officers stop by off duty if you know any.  Often there are a car guy or two on the force. Couple of officers locally have Shelby's.  Plenty of other things we could discuss but this thread is not the place and those comments are not (at least appears not) to be related to this vehicle. Some have been discussed in other threads 
Jeff Speegle- Mustang & Shelby detail collector, ConcoursMustang.com mentor :) and Judge

Richstang

1967 Shelby Research Group 

www.1967ShelbyResearch.com
www.facebook.com/groups/1967shelbyresearch

1991-1993 SAAC MKI, MKII, & Snake Registrar

1967 eight barrel

Jeff, this was very common practice for an off-duty officer to do the verification.  The DMV is an over-reaching bureaucracy and like almost everything else California it is about taxes and fees.  There are many like-minded officers who are car guys. 

silverton_ford

After reviewing the photos from the website, I noticed the Shelby VIN stamped inside the inner door jam on the driver's side.    Is this normal?     Seems like it would take too much time to do at the factory, but I don't know.

I have seen it stamped around the shock mount on top of the shock towers on other cars too.

6s1640

Hi Brian,

For some reason the state of California felt the need to stamp there with a "C" prefix, I am assuming for California.  It is not a San Jose or SAI thing.

Good eye

Cory